Uber's Autonomous Vehicles Responsible For Red Light Violations, Not "Human Error"
Internal documents dispute Uber's public claim.
Despite statements to the press that "human error" was to blame for its vehicles running a series of red lights in San Francisco, the company admitted internally that it was the car that was in autonomous mode when it failed to stop at the traffic signals, according to the New York Times.
Uber's self-driving vehicles committed traffic violations in San Francisco
Uber launched a short-lived autonomous vehicle pilot program in San Francisco late last year using Volvo XC90s and Ford Fusions equipped with its autonomous hardware and software to transport some passengers. The vehicles failed to obey traffic rules requiring them to merge into bike lanes before making right-hand turns, endangering bicyclists, and were video recorded running red lights.
A spokesperson for the ride-hailing company blamed the driver who was behind the wheel of the car for the traffic violations, and reported that the responsible employee had been suspended. However, because the company declined to apply for an autonomous vehicle testing permit it wasn't possible to confirm Uber's account.
The AVT requires companies testing autonomous vehicles to post a $5 million insurance policy or bond and submit reports to the California Department of Motor Vehicles detailing disengagement events where the driver resumes control from autonomous mode. These reports would have shown definitively whether it was the driver or the self-driving system that was in control when the vehicles were filmed running red lights. Rather than comply with state regulations, Uber took its autonomous vehicles to Tempe, Arizona.
Internal documents counter Uber's public statement about "human error"
However, following the exposure of Uber's toxic work culture, two employees told the New York Times that it was not the driver's fault, rather it was the self-driving vehicle that blew through the red lights in San Francisco. Internal documents viewed by the publication backed up those statements.
“In this case, the car went through a red light,” the documents viewed by the New York Times said.
The company is also being sued by competitor Waymo for allegedly using its proprietary technology that was stollen by a former employee. Uber denies this claim, and will defend itself against the lawsuit, but the discovery process could reveal even more about the mobility company's technology maturity.
- RELATEDGM Backing Bills That Could Block Uber, Waymo from Testing Self-Driving CarsGeneral Motors says the bills protect public safety by restricting self-driving car testing to automotive manufacturers. Competitors disagree.READ NOW
- RELATEDWaymo Suing Uber Over Claims of Stolen Self-Driving Car Documents and Trade SecretsAn engineer who migrated from Alphabet's autonomous vehicle program to Uber, the suit claims, may have brought some inside info along for the ride.READ NOW
- RELATEDUber Tells Users Deleting Accounts the Ride-Hailing Company Is "Deeply Hurting"Following the wake of a tumultuous week, Uber drops a not-so-subtle message to users deleting their accounts.READ NOW
- RELATEDUber: Eric Holder, Arianna Huffington to Investigate Sexual Harassment IncidentAnother female Uber engineer corroborates Susan Fowler's claims that sexual harassment and toxic work environments are pervasive at the mobility company, and throughout Silicon Valley.READ NOW
- RELATEDUber Is Facing Strikes All Over the WorldLong hours, low wages, and high commissions stir Uber drivers' ire.READ NOW