More Uber, Lyft Riders Are Ditching Their Own Cars
A sizable percentage of people are giving up their own cars and relying on ride sharing, according to a new poll.
More Americans are using ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft to get around, and that's got many people wondering about ride-sharing's impact on car ownership. A new Reuters/Ipsos poll provides some answers.
According to the poll, nearly 25 percent of Americans sold or traded in a car in the last 12 months. Of that number, 9 percent said they have switched to ride-sharing services as their primary mode of transportation. About the same number said they planned to get rid of their cars and switch to ride sharing in the upcoming 12 months.
Those numbers aren't huge, but they do raise important questions for automakers. While ride-share drivers tend to rack up mileage more quickly—in theory requiring them to buy new cars more often—it's unclear whether that alone would account for the revenue losses associated with a large-scale shift away from private-car ownership.
Carmakers are already considering this. BMW and Daimler both operate car-sharing services, and General Motors has launched an entire brand, Maven, for mobility services. Maven offers both car sharing and low-cost car rentals for Lyft and Uber drivers. Ford has vowed to transform itself from a car company into a "mobility company," something recently-ousted CEO Mark Fields apparently couldn't achieve fast enough.
While ride sharing represents a potential threat to automakers, it also represents a potential opportunity. By operating their own ride-sharing services, automakers could tap into a major new revenue stream, and achieve a competitive advantage over services that rely on drivers buying their own cars.
That advantage could grow if the much-discussed mass deployment of self-driving cars actually happens. Eliminating human drivers would save companies money, but it would also require them to maintain large fleets of self-driving cars. As the companies making said cars, automakers could operate their own services at a lower cost, or make money selling cars to other services.
In the short term, though, ride sharing probably won't displace the vast majority of privately-owned cars. While Uber and Lyft offer good coverage in most major cities, that's not the case in the suburbs and rural areas. These areas also tend to lack public transportation. Neither of those factors are likely to change anytime soon, making driving the only viable option for most people living there.
- RELATEDElon Musk Believes Tesla Ride Sharing Will Be Cheaper Than Public TransportationBillionaire CEO Elon Musk talks about Tesla ride sharing and its potential to cost less than riding the bus.READ NOW
- RELATEDUber Underpaid New York Drivers by Tens of Millions of DollarsThe company shorted New York drivers due to an accounting error, but plans to compensate them.READ NOW
- RELATEDDrivers Don't Trust Uber, Other Ride-Hailing Firms to Build Self-Driving CarsA new study says consumers trust traditional carmakers over tech titans and ride-hailing apps when it comes to making vehicles.READ NOW
- RELATED21 Uber Drivers Arrested by Hong Kong Police in Ride-Hailing CrackdownHong Kong authorities are getting serious with Uber drivers over alleged violations of local laws.READ NOW
- RELATED8,000 Uber, Lyft Drivers in Massachusetts Fail New Background CheckThat's around 11 percent of the ride-hailing drivers in the state. (Er, commonwealth.)READ NOW