---
title: "Full-Size Pickup Trucks Are Terrible at Protecting Rear Passengers: IIHS"
description: "All three American half-ton trucks scored \"poor\" marks in the moderate overlap front crash test, while the Toyota Tundra was rated \"marginal.\""
date: "2023-11-07"
modified: "2023-11-07"
authors:
  - name: "Nico DeMattia"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://www.thedrive.com/authors/nico-demattia"
url: "https://www.thedrive.com/news/full-size-pickup-trucks-are-terrible-at-protecting-rear-passengers-iihs"
categories:
  - "News"
  - "Trucks"
tags:
  - "1500"
  - "Chevrolet"
  - "F-150"
  - "Ford"
  - "pickup"
  - "ram"
  - "silverado"
---

# Full-Size Pickup Trucks Are Terrible at Protecting Rear Passengers: IIHS

![](<https://www.thedrive.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/07/iihs-crash-1.jpg>)
*IIHS*

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently revised its moderate overlap front crash tests with a focus on second-row safety for passengers smaller than the average American man. Vehicles across all classes have struggled with the new criteria, including full-size [pickups](<https://www.thedrive.com/category/trucks>), which the IIHS recently ran through the gauntlet. The results? All three American half-ton pickups scored "poor" marks, while the [Toyota Tundra](<https://www.thedrive.com/new-cars/44074/2022-toyota-tundra-hybrid-first-drive-review-all-about-acceleration>) came away with a slightly better "marginal" rating.

The latest iteration of the moderate overlap front crash test situates a smaller dummy in the second row behind the driver. This dummy is intended to represent a small woman or 12-year-old child, as *[Automotive News](<https://www.autonews.com/regulation-safety/iihs-f-150-silverado-ram-1500-pickups-poor-back-seat-safety>)* explains. All four pickups failed this test because they weren't able to keep this dummy properly positioned in the seat without striking the seat back ahead, or moving excessively in a manner that would likely translate to injuries. "Submarining," when a passenger slides beneath the lap belt, was a common phenomenon.

"Measurements taken from the rear dummy indicated that chest injuries and head or neck injuries would be likely in the F-150 and Ram 1500," the [IIHS report](<https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/large-pickups-offer-strong-side-protection-but-falter-in-back-seat-safety>) reads. For the Silverado passenger, the risk of chest injury was "somewhat lower but still excessive," while the Tundra's dummy fared better in terms of head and neck injuries, but struggled with chest injuries as a consequence of "poor belt positioning."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy2zYosewA8

The easy, knee-jerk reaction to safety is "big car good, small car bad." While larger vehicles tend to be safer than smaller ones [provided all other factors are equal](<https://www.iihs.org/topics/vehicle-size-and-weight>), size tells only part of the story, as the full-size pickups' underwhelming performance in the moderate overlap front crash test reminds us.

The safety restraints for the driver and passenger seated in the front of those trucks worked as designed. Unfortunately, backseat passengers seem to suffer no matter the size of the vehicle they're in, as the most popular models in the [small sedan](<https://www.thedrive.com/news/most-small-cars-are-unsafe-for-backseat-passengers-iihs>), [small pickup truck](<https://www.thedrive.com/news/most-small-pickup-trucks-have-unsafe-back-seats-iihs>), and [minivan](<https://www.thedrive.com/news/all-four-modern-minivans-are-overlooking-backseat-safety-iihs>) segments also graded poorly in the very same IIHS test the bigger pickups failed. Everything from the rake of the rear seat bottom to the placement of the seatbelt anchor can drastically affect a car's ability to keep its rear occupants safe. Poor design in any area will increase the likelihood of injury.

Today, full-size pickups are veritable family haulers. Almost all have four doors, and buyers likely keep some peace of mind that in a crash with a smaller vehicle—as most other cars are likely to be when you're behind the wheel of a Ram, F-150, Silverado, or Tundra—they may stand a better chance at walking away than they might in a crossover. But size and weight are only components of the larger equation. Restraint devices matter, and the ways in which they keep us safe can't be replaced with tacking on mass and driver-assistance tech. Especially not if you're sitting behind the driver.

*Got tips? Send 'em to tips@thedrive.com*

## Author
Nico is a writer and reviewer from New Jersey who probably thinks he’s a lot funnier than he actually is. His love of cars began when he was just a kid playing Gran Turismo 3, grinding out enough race wins with a Mazda Miata to save up for an in-game RUF 911. That passion for small, lightweight sports cars drove his desire to learn more about the industry, get his hands on as many cars as he could, and bring those experiences to life on the page. He cut his teeth writing about BMWs, Volkswagens, and Audis, mostly, and has owned far too many of each. He’s on his fourth 3 Series sedan, but all of his old, cheap German cars have forced him to learn more about car maintenance than his mechanical capability can handle. Too many late nights have been spent scrambling to get a car running by morning so he could get to work. For some reason, he never seems to learn that old Bimmers probably aren’t the best daily drivers. But he loves more than just old German cars. He’ll gladly drive and discuss anything with four (or even three) wheels. Cars aren’t his only passions, though. Nico is also a big nerd and loves movies, video games, comic books, and cares far too much about the New York Giants. So don’t be surprised if you see football references or dumb, obscure movie quotes in any of his car reviews.

### Author social links  
[Instagram](<https://www.instagram.com/ndemattia/>)  
[LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/in/nico-demattia-90885540/>)