The New Diesel Mazda CX-5 Is Only Slightly More Efficient Than the Gas Version
It's great that the diesel is actually coming to the U.S., but it would be greater if the numbers were more impressive.
The Mazda CX-5 is a wildly popular crossover that accounts for more than half of all of Mazda’s sales in this country. We’ve been hearing rumors that Mazda will bring a Skyactiv-D diesel engine to the States for a few years, but now it looks like it’s actually happening thanks to newly posted fuel economy figures on fueleconomy.gov that appear to confirm a diesel option is coming to the U.S.-spec CX-5.
So that means better fuel economy, right? Technically, yes, but it’s not what you might think. We compared the EPA’s numbers and assuming they’re accurate, the FWD CX-5 with a diesel is only more efficient than its gas counterpart by 1 combined mile per gallon. For the AWD models, the diesel gets a whopping 2 combined mpg improvement.
The highway mileage is identical for the two engines (31 for FWD, 30 for AWD) and the city burn rate is a little better for both (28 vs 25 for FWD, 27 vs 24 for AWD). Not only are they barely more efficient, but the EPA estimates you’ll actually be spending more money on fuel with the diesels than you would be with the gas engines thanks to difference in pump prices. Here are the EPA’s estimated annual fuel costs for each model:
- FWD Gas:$1,500
- FWD Diesel:$1,650
- AWD Gas:$1,650
- AWD Diesel:$1,700
These differences are pretty modest, but the only one of the bunch where the EPA estimates that you’ll spend less money on gas than the average new vehicle is the FWD gas-powered CX-5.
What’s more damning for the diesel CX-5 is that its only direct competitor is the diesel Chevy Equinox which is significantly more efficient on the highway. The FWD and AWD versions of the diesel Equinox both get 32 combined mpg which handily beats the diesel CX-5’s 29 and 28 combined mpg for the FWD and AWD models, respectively. The diesel Equinox is even more efficient on the highway than the hybrid variants of the Toyota RAV4 and Nissan Rogue.
So, the only reason to get a diesel CX-5 is if you specifically really want a diesel CX-5. If the EPA is to be believed, you’ll save more money in the long run with the slightly less efficient gas engine—or with a diesel Equinox, of course.
- RELATED2018 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring Review: Slaying With Suburbanites, If Lacking in SpaceThis Mazda is fit for making an entrance at the BBQ, but a fantastic family hauler it isn't.READ NOW
- RELATEDWith Skyactiv-X, Mazda Seeks to Keep the Internal Combustion Flame BurningWill combing spark-powered and compression-based ignition help this small automaker survive in the EV era?READ NOW
- RELATEDMazda, Suzuki Admit to Emissions and Fuel Economy Test Errors in Japan (Updated)Nikkei goes on to name motorcycle maker Yamaha as another suspected cheater.READ NOW
- RELATEDMazda Targets 56 Percent Thermal Efficiency With Skyactiv-3Skyactiv-X's compression ignition is already the talk of the town, but Mazda thinks more can be achieved from internal combustion.READ NOW
- RELATEDMazda, Saudi Oil Company Will Jointly Research Emissions Reductions for Internal-Combustion CarsMazda isn't ready to give up on gasoline.READ NOW